We owe Michael Jackson an apology. I picked up an issue of Ebony at an airport recently and was pretty much blown away. I was blown away by the positivity, the respect, the complete warmth of the portrait. The article presented Michael Jackson as an adult, with significant accomplishments, a thinking, genius artist, in control of his art, and deserving of admiration. In other words, the complete other side of the coin from what (white) TV and (white) newspapers have tarred and feathered him as.
Ebony asked the questions that actually humanized him: “How did you and Quincy come to consensus on creative decisions?” (When was the last time you saw mainstream media portray MJ as a clever decision maker and working man?) And Ebony asked “What has been challenging about raising your sons? What lessons do you try to teach them?” (I think my entire knowledge of his parenting comes from a single tabloid photo of him, as if that describes his entire decade as a parent.)
After I got a glimpse of from this sympathetic Ebony interview portraying Jackson as fully human, the underlying reasons for our mainstream media culture (white media culture) started to look ridiculous and even creepy.
If you think of an objective summary of MJ and everything he is or has been, and then then contrast it to the conventional wisdom on him, it presents a snapshot of our subconscious. The white journalists’ conception (and by extension, OUR conception) of MJ as a nut, a masquarade, or at best an object of pity, reveals our conceptions about celebrities and specifically black celebrities. The journalists and editors that broadcast, filter, amplify (and perhaps slander or invent) the freakshow aspect of the story, feel confident that their story will get traction, that it will find a receptive audience. I find this damning of us as readers, because they are right: we the audience have pretty dutifully accepted it.
When was the last time you read a story about Jackson freakishness and then internally longed to get his side of the story? Where in white media are there any public apologists for him? Do papers run Opinion pieces defending MJ’s side of things, the way they would for, say, a politician? When you call out Bill Clinton on his freakiness, does he not have high profile defenders?
When we hear about weird stuff done by young, blonde actor isn’t there a tiny element of “what made this person crazy”, “lets try to explain the logic of how this happened, what drove them to this” or even “hey, everybody has a bad day” and (if it’s a guy) “hey, we all sow our wild oats”. But if MJ does something it’s straight to “yeah, man, whacko Jacko, not quite human” and, parenthetically, probably subconsciously, “dude’s black, afterall.”
I don’t think it’s an overreaction to say we need to look into our hearts and be aware of the race element we bring into our judging of Michael Jackson.
On a cheerier note, I can offer no more complete defense of Michael than this excellent song for your iPod. Right click ‘save as’ and go make a cup of tea.
Download 01_i_want_you_back.mp3
The Ebony MJ interview is paid-content but there is a free postscript here.
And an innocent Jackson 5ive Saturday Morning Cartoon is here.
Recent Comments